Inclusive Writing

Disclaimer: This is a difficult subject to discuss. I will do my best to write with the utmost sensitivity, but I cannot speak for all races, ages, sexualities, genders, or body types. I can only write what can be deemed by logic, and I acknowledge that I’m also subject to personal bias based on my upbringing and the media I consume. I would appreciate that any flaws in this article be addressed in a polite tone so that I may understand my error and move to change my views without risk of being offended or attacked because of my lack of knowledge. Thank you.


“Write what you know” is always what they tell you, but when you want to include characters of a different ethnicity, sexuality, ability, body type, even different gender, it can be a daunting task. You don’t want to offend anyone by your portrayals. They’re different, and as much as differences are a beautiful thing, they are a barrier between you and understanding others.

The biggest piece of advice I can give is to start within your comfort zone. When you write, your characters are always a reflection of you, your main character more so than others. At the beginning of your writing career, a good strategy is to use this, and make your main character reflect yourself. Start with that; stick with what you know firsthand.

As an author, you may want to be as inclusive as you can, but do not force it. Inaccurate inclusion can be just as damaging as disregarding inclusion at all. If you have nothing to base those characters on, it’s even harder. What would a fifty-year-old Englishman know about writing the story of a preteen Chinese girl? What would a mid-twenties straight woman know about writing the story of a coloured gay man in the 1890s?

That is where research comes into play. A lot of research, just like every other aspect of ensuring a story’s accuracy. Can you step into the shoes of this character? If you have doubts, change your narrative; put the story on hold; maybe you’re just not ready to write it.

What is “Over-Inclusion”?

You may find it hard to believe that over-inclusion can exist, but it does, and no, it doesn’t mean that because not 100% of the characters are white, straight men that now white-straight men are feeling less seen. Over-inclusion is when the characters do not match the setting or the story. Caucasian and coloured children together in the same 1930s school? Sadly, this is not historically accurate. A powerful, headstrong woman facing no prejudice of any sort in Victorian England? Not historically likely. A transgender gay man, in our own day and age, facing absolutely no discrimination from anyone? Not very believable.

You must also consider why you are telling this story. Why would you want to write from this character’s perspective? Is it because of a certain message you want to share? Is this the only way you can portray this message?

For example, when I was in college, my class was studying the treatment of Indigenous people in Canada. I had the idea for a short story in which an indigenous girl joins a modern-day elementary school. At first, the story was meant to be about the indigenous girl and how she was adjusting to the school, especially after how her parents and grandparents were treated in schools previously. My professor informed me that since I am not indigenous, this is not my story to tell. My narrative instead switched to the perspective of a girl in the same school, reacting to the indigenous girl joining her class. The main character’s family was racist, and the point of the story was for the MC to begin in alignment with her family’s views, only to realize that those views were wrong and that she was uninformed. She gets to know the indigenous girl better, and eventually, they become friends. She pulls herself loose from her family’s views.

Tell the stories you’re meant to tell, not the ones you want to tell. Stories about gay people should be told by gay people. Stories about black people should be told by black people. Stories about trans people should be told by trans people. Stories about Indian people should be told by Indian people. Stories about indigenous people should be told by indigenous people. Et cetera. If it is a story that you absolutely have to tell, discuss with someone whose experience is firsthand, because decisions should not be made for a group without them having a seat at the table; it goes against the entire purpose of inclusive writing.

Now, there are things you can do, like with all other things in writing, so long as logically, they make sense. Not only can you include characters of other races, backgrounds, and cultures in your work, but you can include characters of varying sexualities and genders as well. You can include characters with physical disabilities; you can include overweight/underweight characters and characters who face the struggles of body-shaming by others; you can include characters struggling with non-physical disabilities like depression or anxiety; you can include characters on the autism spectrum. Give them a place, make them accurate, and your story has everything it needs to have, but the perspective should be from you, not from you pretending to be someone else.

Related Article(s):
10 Tips for New Writers
Writing Good Characters
Pixar’s 22 Storytelling Rules

10 responses to “Inclusive Writing”

  1. I don’t think writers of fiction should have to consider anybody’s feelings when creating a fictional character. It is fiction. If you can’t even handle fiction, how can you handle reality?

    1. There’s a difference between simply catering to overly-sensitive people (which I do not recommend) and having basic human decency. It doesn’t have to change your writing, but you should still be respectful of others (especially those who have faced and still face harsh discrimination).

      1. No, when writing fiction, you should not. That is a form of censorship and also limits the freedom of speech. Writers write, that is what they do. If you do not like their writing, read another book or write one yourself. I am talking about fiction here. The best part about these books is that they can help readers deal with problems they are having in real life by seeing a character in the book dealing with the same issues.

      2. I’m sorry; I’m confused. Basic human decency is a form of censorship? Ensuring accuracy and showing respect to minority groups by increasing representation limits the freedom of speech? Nowhere in my article have I said that writers shouldn’t write what they want to write, but you must know that hate speech is not protected by freedom of speech, which it seems like you are trying to argue.
        If I am misinterpreting your words, please let me know, but if not, you are welcome to click away and read something else if you don’t like what is said in this article.
        All the same, I thank you for reading and sharing your thoughts.

      3. If you are writing a work of fiction, you should not be limited in what you are allowed to write. Human decency is a very vague term and is interpreted differently by everyone, but yes, it is a form of censorship if you use it to say someone is not allowed to say something in a work of fiction. That is within the definition of the term.
        One does not have to be accurate in a work of fiction either. It is fiction. Fiction means it is not real. If it were real, it would non-fiction. If you put limits on to what authors of fiction can or cannot write, it is definitely a form of censorship. Ans if you limit the authors of fiction in any way, they will find other ways of saying things (e.g. Animal Farm).
        Again, it is the reader’s choice to read or not read a book and the fact that you used this expression, too, totally destroys your own arguments supporting your statements. And if people feel a book causes emotional damage, I advise them to read things like Antifragile or Free-Range kids.

      4. PS, using my own argument about a work of fiction against me when talking about your non-fiction article, kind of proves my point. Thank you.

      5. Nowhere in my article have I said that people should be forced to write a certain way or write certain things. I published this article for writers wanting to incorporate more inclusivity into their writing who are confused about where to start. I have no idea why you chose to read the article if all you were going to do is argue that people can write whatever they want anyway. I already know that.
        Fiction is fiction. It doesn’t have to be true–in fact, that’s kind of the whole point. But I’ve found that the more accurate fiction is, the more appealing it is. Accurate, not fact-based. (That seems to be what you’re stuck on.) Inaccurate writing is often a result of the author not doing proper research, which shows that they’re either lazy, or they don’t care, so why should the reader care about what they’ve written?
        The article holds suggestions. If someone wants to add more diversity to their fiction, I provided some insight on how they can do that, expecially if they’re worried about offending anyone. (Some people are more sensitive about stepping on people’s toes.)
        You can write what you want, Mike. No one is stopping you.
        Anyway, thank you for the laugh. I really enjoy hearing your perspective.

      6. Thank you for that clarification. I am glad it made you laugh. Your article was laughable, too. Keep on writing in a free world.

  2. Excellent way to approach a nuanced subject.

    I am a firm believer in that intent is everything; if a writer sets out to be offensive, they will be, if not… they still might, but not by way of intent.

    I think that when it comes to writing and other forms of creative expression, the risk of offending will always be present, it’s important to be mindful but not to feel as though you’re navigating a mine field (which is often the case in today’s climate).

    I think you wrote this wonderfully, and it gives space for personal reflection while addressing a broader audience — well done.

    1. Thank you! That’s what I aim to accomplish – inspiring the writers of today to not only be mindful of others, but who also strive to improve respresentation of minorities and give them the respect they deserve.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: